Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Sharing learning from hospital trusts on a journey of quality improvement
  1. Iona Thorne,
  2. Jeremy Cox,
  3. Edward Baker
  1. Care Quality Commission, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Iona Thorne, Care Quality Commission, London SW1W 9SW, UK; iona.thorne{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Background Quality improvement (QI) has been shown to deliver better patient outcomes, and improved operational, organisational and financial performance when led effectively and supported by organisational systems and training. Surveys of staff and patient satisfaction also show positive effects. In many trusts that Care Quality Commission (CQC) has rated as outstanding, a culture of QI has been embedded throughout the organisation.

Objectives We wanted to hear trusts’ experiences of using QI as a systematic approach to improving service quality, efficiency and morale, and share learning from these organisations to drive further improvement to quality of care.

Methods Using CQC’s comprehensive inspection programme of all healthcare providers nationally, we identified 19 trusts for inclusion and carried out an in-depth review of their improvement journeys.

Results We found that commitment from the board and senior leadership is crucial to ensuring success on the QI journey, modelling effective leadership behaviours that enable all staff to deliver improvement. These organisations have a systematic approach to QI, using a consistent model, anchored in a systems perspective, and often across a health system. The model of improvement requires leaders of all backgrounds and frontline staff to work together in improvement, and can help to break down barriers between managers and clinicians, and providers and patients, so there is a shared purpose to deliver better care to patients.

Conclusions QI is not a magic bullet, but is an important factor in the evolution of an organisation from a traditional ‘command and control’ form of management towards higher performing approaches to the design and management of work.

  • improvement
  • continuous improvement

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors IT, JC and EB devised and planned the work. IT conducted the interviews and qualitative analysis of themes. JC and IT completed the field work. IT and JC drafted the full report, with input from EB. IT drafted the brief report, with input from JC and EB.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests All authors are employed by the Care Quality Commission.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.