You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original research
What makes for a ‘Top Doc’? An analysis of UK press portrayals of so-called top doctors
  1. Paul Keeley1,
  2. Mark Taubert2,
  3. Emma Wardle3,
  4. Simon Tavabie4,
  5. Ollie Minton4
  1. 1 Palliative Care Research Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
  2. 2 Palliative Care Department, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
  3. 3 School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  4. 4 Palliative Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Mark Taubert, Palliative Care Department, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK; mtaubert{at}doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Objective To determine the characteristics of medical practitioners designated ‘top doctor’ or ‘Top Doc’ in the UK press.

Design Observational study of news stories related to the term top doctor (or Top Doc) with analysis using data from publicly available databases.

Setting News reports in the UK press accessed via a database from national newspapers from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Stories relating to disciplinary/criminal matters were analysed separately.

Main outcome measures Results were cross-referenced with the General Medical Council register of medical practitioners for gender, year of qualification, whether on the general practitioner (GP) or the specialist register, and if on the specialist register, which specialty.

Results There was a gender divide, with 80% of so-called top doctors being male. National top doctors had been qualified for a median time of 31 years. Top doctors are widely spread among specialties; 21% of top doctors were on the GP register. Officers of the British Medical Association and the various Royal Colleges are also well represented. ‘Top doctors’ facing disciplinary proceedings are more overwhelmingly male, working in hospital specialties and less obviously eminent in their field.

Conclusion There is no clear definition of a ‘top doctor’, nor are there objective leadership criteria for journalists to use when applying this label. Establishing a definition of ‘top doctor’, for instance, via the UK Faculty for Medical Leadership and Management, which offers postnominals and accreditation for high-achieving medical professionals, may reduce subjectivity.

  • clinical leadership
  • engagement
  • leadership assessment
  • medical leadership
  • professional societies

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2022-000735

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @ProfMarkTaubert, @SimonTavabie, @'drol007

  • Contributors PK had the idea for the article and retrieved the press data. All authors PK, MT, OM, EW and ST were involved in the analysis of data and cross-referencing against the GMC register of medical practitioners. PK wrote the draft manuscript and all authors PK, MT, OM, EW and ST contributed, until a final version was agreed upon. PK is guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.