Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Ivory tower in MD/PhD programmes: sticky floor, broken ladder and glass ceiling
  1. Achint Lail1,
  2. Jeffrey Ding2,
  3. Brayden K Leyva3,
  4. Sabeena Jalal1,
  5. Sunny Nakae4,
  6. Saleh Fares5,
  7. Faisal Khosa6
  1. 1Faculty of Science, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  3. 3Department of Physiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
  4. 4Department of Medical Education, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, California, USA
  5. 5Department of Emergency Medicine, Zayed Military Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE
  6. 6Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Faisal Khosa; fkhosa{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective Achieving gender equity in academic medicine is not only a matter of social justice but also necessary in promoting an innovative and productive academic community. The purpose of this study was to assess gender distribution in dual MD/PhD academic programme faculty members across North America.

Methods Academic metrics were analysed to quantify the relative career success of academic faculty members in MD/PhD programmes. Measured parameters included academic and leadership ranks along with nominal research factors such as peer-reviewed research publications, H-index, citation number and years of active research.

Results Χ² analysis revealed a statistically significant (p<0.0001, χ²=114.5) difference in the gender distribution of faculty and leadership across North American MD/PhD programmes. Men held 74.2% of full professor positions, 64% of associate professor positions, 59.4% of assistant professor positions and 62.8% of lecturer positions. Moreover, men occupied a larger share of faculty leadership roles with a statistically significant disparity across all ranks (p<0.001, χ²=20.4). A higher proportion of men held positions as department chairs (79.6%), vice chairs (69.1%) and programme leads (69.4%).

Conclusion Gender disparity was prevalent in the MD/PhD programmes throughout North America with women achieving a lower degree of professional stature than men. Ultimately, steps must be taken to support women faculty to afford them better opportunities for academic and professional advancement.

  • clinical leadership
  • effectiveness
  • efficiency
  • leadership assessment
  • management system

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • X @KHOSAFAISAL

  • Contributors AL, JD, BKL and FK made substantial contributions to the conception of the work. SJ performed the analysis and interpretation of the data. SN and SF contributed to the interpretation of the data. All authors made substantial contributions to the drafting of the work and reviewing it critically. The guarantor is the corresponding author, FK. All authors have given final approval for publication of this work.

  • Funding Disparities Research Institute Ltd. FK is the recipient of the Michael Smith Health Research BC Award (2023-2028). This research was supported by Disparities Research Institute Ltd.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.