Background Even prior to the pandemic, many US physicians experienced burnout affecting patient care quality, safety and experience. Institutions often focus on personal resilience instead of system-level issues. Our leaders developed a novel process to identify and prioritise key system-related solutions and work to mitigate factors that negatively impact clinician well-being through a structured listening campaign.
Methods The listening campaign consists of meeting with each clinician group leader, a group listening session, a follow-up meeting with the leader, a final report and a follow-up session. During the listening session, clinicians engage in open discussion about what is going well, complete individual reflection worksheets and identify one ‘wish’ to improve their professional satisfaction. Participants rate these wishes to assist with prioritisation.
Results As of January 2020, over 200 clinicians participated in 20 listening sessions. One hundred and twenty-two participants completed a survey; 80% stated they benefited from participation and 83% would recommend it to others.
Conclusion Collecting feedback from clinicians on their experience provides guidance for leaders in prioritising initiatives and opportunities to connect clinicians to organisational resources. A listening campaign is a tool recommended for healthcare systems to elicit clinician perspectives and communicate efforts to address systemic factors.
- health system
- clinical leadership
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors SER, VK, KC and BL contributed to the project concept and design. SER, VK, KC and BL contributed to project execution and data acquisition. SER, VK, KC, JW and BL drafted the initial paper, and all authors contributed to its revising and review and approved the final manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.