Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Game of snakes and ladders: barriers and enablers for aspiring women leaders in healthcare
  1. Lucia Magee1,
  2. Rose Penfold2
  1. 1Population Health Research Institute, St. George's University London, London, UK
  2. 2Geriatric Medicine, Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lucia Magee, Population Health Research Institute, St. George's University London, London, UK; Lucia.Magee{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Background Women comprise over three-quarters of the National Health Service workforce, yet remain underrepresented in senior medical grades, on managerial boards and in senior leadership roles. This is attributed to a wide range of internalised, interpersonal and structural factors.

Objective To explore the experiences of aspiring clinical leaders working with senior female leader colleagues and the perceived impact of these interactions on professional development and future aspirations.

Methods Healthcare professionals, self-identifying as female aspiring clinical leaders, were recruited via email and social media to participate in a focus group or semistructured interview. Interviews were recorded and reviewed and the key enablers, barriers and actions to facilitate opportunities for female clinical leaders in the workplace identified.

Results Participants (n=11) had varied experiences of working with senior female colleagues. Reported barriers from existing leaders included ‘Queen Bee’ phenomenon and reticence to talk about barriers faced. Enablers included ‘nudging’ towards opportunities and women leaders sharing challenges they had faced and overcome.

Conclusion Supporting women to achieve their leadership potential requires individualised support, role modelling and mentorship, and organisational change to tackle workplace biases and microaggressions. These are crucial to ensuring gender balance across leadership in health and social care.

  • clinical leadership
  • career development
  • mentoring
  • trainees

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Twitter @LMgee3, @rosespenfold

  • Contributors LM and RP planned the study, conducted the interviews with participants and collected the data. LM and RP analysed the data. Both LM and RP were involved in drafting of the manuscript and approval of final version to be published.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.