Article Text

Download PDFPDF

37 A network approach to supporting the career development of specialty and associate specialist (SAS) doctors Cheshire and Merseyside palliative and end of life care network
Free
  1. Paula Powell1,
  2. Helen Bonwick,
  3. Esraa Sulaivany
  1. 1Cheshire and Merseyside Palliative and End of Life Care Network

Abstract

Context Cheshire and Merseyside Palliative and End of Life Care Network (PEOLC)

I am submitting as Consultant Clinical and Workforce Lead for Cheshire and Merseyside PEOLC Network. The co-authors are Associate Specialists who both have senior clinical roles in their organisations and were co-Chairs of the APM SAS doctors committee. The work described has been supported by our Strategic Clinical Network Programme Manager and the project team.

Cheshire and Merseyside have led on supporting the development of SAS doctors for the last 10 years. An action learning set in 2012 developed the first Training and Development Framework for SAS doctors in palliative medicine and this has been updated a further 3 times, most recently in 2020. This has been accepted across the NW and by the Association for Palliative medicine.

Our Trainers committee fully supports SAS doctors and there is a SAS representative on the group who reports issues regularly.

Issue/Challenge Medical workforce challenges are apparent in all specialties. A recent specialist palliative care workforce review for Cheshire and Merseyside showed that we have a 20 WTE gap in Consultants across all settings. We had found in a survey of SAS doctors working in palliative care that terms and conditions of service and opportunities for career development were often lacking and SAS doctors were unsure where they could seek guidance and help when they worked in the voluntary sector (often hospices)

The impact of this is that many experienced SAS doctors were not getting the opportunity to fulfill senior clinical roles and contribute to service development or felt unsupported when they were.

It was also the case that SAS doctors in hospices who were required to be responsible clinicians or medical directors had no framework to support them in their own development or an assurance process of their skills and competencies.

Assessment of issue and analysis of its causes

In 2021 a survey of 35 SAS doctors in the Network there were 14 responses. Of these 43% had worked in palliative care for more than 10 years and 30% expressed a desire to use the CESR route to gaining specialist registration.

They also identified significant variation in education and training opportunities.

This survey was presented to an annual SAS doctors development day in 2021 and the Trainers Committee for the NW.

Impact As a result of the survey a working group was established to consider how organisations could support the development of SAS doctors and allow them to gain experience outside of their own organisation which is of benefit to the individual and organisations they work for.

Previously organisations had been reluctant to allow ‘swaps’ of doctors because of perceived HR challenges or ensuring ‘like for like’ competencies.

A hospice and regional cancer centre agreed to test this out and subsequently 3 doctors were rotated over a period of 6 months between the 2 sites. The individuals experience of this was presented to the local trainers committee in Dec 2021. They saw a number of benefits including working with different teams, the challenges of different approaches in a tertiary cancer centre and a hospice in patient unit and community team. All felt more confident in their clinical and leadership development.

2 are planning CESR applications in the next 12-18 months.

Currently a SAS doctor is rotated with an IMT3 trainee from a hospital setting and a further hospice-hospice swaps are planned next year.

Intervention In addition to supporting rotations for SAS doctors we have addressed the issue of senior SAS doctors in leadership roles in hospices who are often required to step in to Responsible Clinical or Medical Director roles sometimes with relatively little experience or support.

The authors subsequently developed a Framework to support SAS doctors acting as Responsible Clinicians or Medical Directors in Hospices. This describes the skills and attributes required and the support that should be expected of an organisation to support them. This has been acknowledged as a key document in support of SAS doctors by the National Clinical Director for Palliative and End of Life Care.

We now have a SAS doctor group as a formal Network group that has an annual development day and quartely meetings.

All SAS doctors are able to attend the education programme for specialist trainees across NW which was not happening before.

The resources we have developed could be used by networks and organisations to support SAS doctors.

Training committees could engage with SAS doctors to understand their training and education needs and seek local ways to support this.

Involvement of stakeholders, such as patients, carers or family members:

Patients were not directly involved in this development work

Key Messages SAS doctors are a valuable and significant part of the specialist workforce, many are hugely experienced but career development can be challenging because of the focus on service delivery.

Our approach includes identifying and valuing the expertise and contribution of SAS doctors and gives them opportunities to develop their careers through resources, opportunities to gain experience beyond their own organisation, education and training.

Developing experienced clinicians in to senior roles benefits patients and responds to the significant workforce issues that we have nationally

Lessons learnt This work is very much on going. We describe the key milestones over the past 10 years in creating our current model across Cheshire and Merseyside to support doctors in SAS roles to develop their careers.

The key challenge is the requirement for service provision often placed on SAS doctors that can impact on their ability to access development opportunities in favour of doctors in specialist training. This is short sighted as we have huge gaps in consultant numbers and doctors in training will not be able to fulfill these.

Measurement of improvement We are expecting 4 CESR applications in the next 12-18 months.

The Responsible Clinicians and Medical Directors Framework is currently being used in 3 hospices who wish to ensure support for their SAS doctors in senior leadership roles

Strategy for improvement Our next step is to gain recognition for the Responsible Clinicians and Medical Directors Framework by the Association for Palliative Medicine so this can be a resource nationally for hospices.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.