Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Context
As clinicians, our responsibilities include the use and promotion of reflection to ensure we continue to learn and improve our clinical practice.1 While reflective practice is a key tenet upheld by governing bodies including health practitioner regulation agencies and the health services which we work for, it is rarely harnessed, enforced or facilitated during the clinical workday.2 3 In fact, most clinicians never engage in self-initiated reflective practice.3 4 When they do, clinicians only engage superficially to fulfil summative requirements or as part of a supervisor-facilitated session to unpack a near-miss or critical clinical incident.2–4 Thus, I compare two commonly taught clinician reflection models, one with brief and simple instructions, and another with more complex cues, aimed to encourage clinicians to build reflective practice into their day-to-day clinical duties.5
Ghaye (2010): a reflective model to facilitate positive action
Ghaye’s four-step model (2010) harnesses appreciative inquiry to promote learning and improved clinical care within complex social systems.6 Reflections are used to inspire the clinician to apply a positive, collaborative and solutions-based lens to unpack challenging experiences.
The model guides reflection by asking clinicians to:
Appreciate: ask what is successful and positive right now?
Imagine: what do we need to keep doing and stop doing to make this better in the future?
Design: how do we do this?
Act: who takes action and with what consequences and impact?
Strengths
Ghaye’s model emphasises a strength-based, rather than a deficit-based, approach to improvement. This approach is unique to both reflective models and the practice of medicine. The positive positioning of this model ensures that negative ideas are tackled with a resourceful mindset; that the reflection primes the clinicians to be optimistic, resilient, embrace change, enhance learning and to reach their full potential.6 7
This model draws on a process called collective discovery by which the person reflecting …
Footnotes
Twitter @JyeGard
Contributors The author confirms sole responsibility for the following: article conception, design, model analysis and interpretation and manuscript preparation.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.