Article Text

Download PDFPDF
What do tomorrow’s doctors really need to know?
  1. James Mountford1,2
  1. 1 Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  2. 2 UCL Partners, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr James Mountford, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK; mountfordjamesj{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Just as health services worldwide are under ever-greater pressure, so there is ever-greater potential demand on what professionals need to know. The rate of change in health systems is accelerating, driven by diverse factors, including rapidly advancing technology, changing societal attitudes and demographics of disease. While a great part of learning is experiential, ’space' is at a premium in all formal curricula.

In BMJ Leader’s first year, we have published a wide range of pieces which suggest space will need to be found for elements not traditionally considered core to medical professional knowledge. In this edition, Donaghy et al 1 present findings from a leadership fellowship in Northern Ireland and Pearson et al 2 similarly for a programme in Scotland. Both these suggest that participants (and by extension the systems involved) gained substantially from these selective, out of programme, leadership schemes. But to what extent should the knowledge gained in these programmes be core for all medical graduates, an essential part of the core skill set for ‘doctor’ in future?

More broadly, how well do our current undergraduate and postgraduate training programmes reflect and emphasise what doctors will need to know over the next 30 years? Everyone will have their own story about topics learnt often in great depth which have not proven core to what people find they need when practising. The …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.