Characteristics of the included review articles
| Author and publication year | Type of review article | No. of references | Countries |
| 1. McKimm et al, 200931 | Comparative review of ML development | 40 | UK; New Zealand |
| 2.O’Sullivan and McKimm, 201132 | Case study-based review of ML development | 16 | Denmark; USA; Canada; Italy; Australia; New Zealand |
| 3. Coltart et al, 2011 | Literature search based ‘viewpoint’ on ML development for early career doctors | 24 | UK |
| 4.Webb et al, 201435 | Systematic literature review on medical curricula containing ML teaching interventions | 34 | Various countries |
| 5. Jorm and Parker, 2014 | Literature based ‘perspective’ on (lack of) evidence for ML development programmes and education | 25 | Australia |
| 6. Sebastian et al, 2016 | General review on a national ML framework | 65 | Australia |
| 7.Hartley 201636 | Literature review-based assessment framework for ML development across systems | 70 | Various countries |