Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Near-peer leadership workshops in Cardiff University
  1. Ned G Powell1,
  2. Ian Collings2,
  3. Philip Kloer3,
  4. Peter Lees4
  1. 1 Centre for Medical Education, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  2. 2 Wales Deanery, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  3. 3 Medical Directorate, Hywel Dda University Health Board, Carmarthen, UK
  4. 4 Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ned G Powell, Centre for Medical Education, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK; powellng{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Leadership is important at all stages of medical education. This must be the case, otherwise why would those of us who read and score Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) statements be asked to identify and evaluate markers of peer respect and leadership? Students are clearly aware of this too, otherwise why would they devote so many words to describing their leadership roles in Duke of Edinburgh’s awards, sports teams and societies? But once at medical school, the importance of leadership may be being forgotten. This is despite the growing body of evidence linking clinical outcomes to the quality of teamwork and leadership; for example, the strong association between effective teamworking and mortality demonstrated by West et al.1 This potentially does our students a disservice. Would it not be better to flag the importance of these qualities and encourage students to develop their leadership capabilities further, rather than allowing them to lie fallow for several years?

Aims

In collaboration with the Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management (FMLM), we recently set out to raise the profile of Leadership …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors NGP, IC, PK and PL designed the session. NGP, IC and PL delivered the session. NGP wrote the report.

  • Funding No funding was received to support this session.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Detail has been removed from this case description/these case descriptions to ensure anonymity. The editors and reviewers have seen the detailed information available and are satisfied that the information backs up the case the authors are making.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.