You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Brief report
Leadership experiences of elite football team physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot study
  1. Sean Carmody1,2,
  2. Gurneet Brar3,
  3. Andrew Massey4,
  4. Craig Rosenbloom5,6,7,
  5. Vincent Gouttebarge1,2,8,9,
  6. Mike Davison10,11
  1. 1 Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2 Amsterdam Collaboration on Health & Safety in Sports (ACHSS), AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3 Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
  4. 4 Medical Department, Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Zurich, Switzerland
  5. 5 Technical Directorate, The Football Association, Burton-upon-Trent, UK
  6. 6 The Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  7. 7 Tottenham Hotspur Football Club, London, UK
  8. 8 Section Sports Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
  9. 9 Football Players Worldwide (FIFPRO), Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
  10. 10 Isokinetic Medical Group, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, 11 Harley Street, London, UK
  11. 11 Football Research Group, Linköping, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Sean Carmody, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam AZ 1105, The Netherlands; seanocearmaide{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to explore the leadership experiences of elite football team physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods A pilot-study based on a cross-sectional design by means of an electronic survey was conducted. The survey relied on 25 questions divided into distinct sections including among others professional and academic experience, leadership experiences and perspectives.

Results A total of 57 physicians (91% male; mean age: 43 years) gave their electronic informed consent and completed the survey. All participants agreed that the demands of their role had increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fifty-two (92%) participants reported that they felt they were expected to take more of a leadership role during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eighteen (35%) reported feeling under pressure to make clinical decisions which were not in keeping with best clinical practice. Additional roles, duties and demands expected of team doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic were subdivided into communication, decision-making, logistical, and public health demands.

Conclusion The findings from this pilot study suggest that the way in which team physicians at professional football clubs operate has altered since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with greater demands placed on leadership skills including decision-making, communication and ethical stewardship. This has potential implications for sporting organisations, clinical practice and research.

  • COVID-19
  • clinical leadership
  • communication

This article is made freely available for personal use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage

https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2022-000603

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors SC, GB and MD developed the survey used to collect the data for this research project. SC drafted the original manuscript, all coauthors reviewed the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.